1. Home
  2. Tyre
  3. Deestone
  4. Vincente R302

Deestone Vincente R302

Dry Grip 60%
Wet Grip 34%
Road Feedback 28%
Handling 26%
Wear 52%
Comfort 17%
Buy again 10%

The Deestone Vincente R302 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

Show All

Tyre review data from 6 tyre reviews averaging 32% over 23,212 miles driven.

    Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Deestone Vincente R302
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Deestone Vincente R302
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Deestone Vincente R302. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top Deestone Vincente R302 Review

Given 53% while driving a Citroën C3 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 4,000 average miles
Only had them for 3 months but the noise is deafening. The kids can't sit in the back. Seen them rated as noise level 2 and 3. They are at their worst around 60 mph but once you go above 75 mph the noise reduces. Stuck them on the car as a low budget but will not buy again. Noise at 30 mph reminds me of army jeeps going along tarmac.
43 - tyre reviewed on January 13, 2017   

Latest Deestone Vincente R302 Reviews

Have you driven on the Deestone Vincente R302 tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Vincente R302.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 36% while driving a Mazda RX8 (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Shocking tyres, can't wait to get them removed. Incredibly noisy above 50mph, virtually no grip in the wet, poor grip in the dry. Had the abs kick in on a slightly damp road under strong but not heavy braking. Should be banned from sale.
These were fitted to my Mazda rx8 when I bought it, have already changed the rears to Goodyear Eagle F1's and the difference is night and day.
0 - tyre reviewed on November 3, 2019   
Given 20% while driving a Peugeot 508SW HDi estate with 17" wheels (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 easy going miles
My wife had these fitted less than 2 months ago whilst driving on a dual carriageway last night at 60 miles an hour the rear tyre split apart like a remould and we nearly lost control so dangerous will never buy these again I would post a picture if I could
6 - tyre reviewed on September 25, 2018   
Are cheap winter tyres safe, or a false economy? Watch this video to find out!
Given 40% while driving a Nissan 2002 patrol (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12 average miles
road noisy lovle very bad at low speed, but they seam be wearing quite well for price paid
4 - tyre reviewed on March 25, 2018   
Given 39% while driving a Honda Civic Diesel (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
These Chinese poverty tyres are terrible in all aspects. The wet grip is alarming and resembles driving on a beginning layer of ice. Noisy and uncomfortable ride. There are better economy tyres that cost only a bit more, and your life is worth that extra. A garage near me buys in Chinese tyres at £8 a tyre and fits them when anybody asks for something cheap, because clearly a dangerous car is preferable to a few less packs of cigarettes or a few less gallons of booze. They're rubbish and dangerous. Avoid.
3 - tyre reviewed on March 25, 2018   
Given 34% while driving a Honda 1.8 VTi (225/45 R17 W) on for 12,000 miles
Tyre annoyingly noisy after 20,00 km, I will not recommend this and may not buy again.
1 - tyre reviewed on May 14, 2017   

See all 7 customer reviews of the Deestone Vincente R302 (newest first) >>